Case number: 2025(Shi)177, 178

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.11.10

Title: (Criminal Case) Decision concerning materials that the court in charge of a quasi-appeal under Article 430 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should take into consideration when determining the appropriateness of the measures undertaken by the investigative authorities

Case number: 2024(Ju)120

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.10.30

Title: (Civil Case) Judgment concerning the ownership of a claim for personal injury insurance proceeds which become claimable upon the death of

Case number: 2024(A)585

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.10.21

Title: (Criminal Case) Decision concerning the case in which it was ruled that a warehouse container falls within the scope of

Case number: 2024(Kyo)17

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.10.20

Title: (Civil Case) Decision concerning whether an incorporated political party, etc. referred to in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Granting of Juridical Personality to Political Party Receiving Political Party Grants qualifies to receive an order to commence bankruptcy proceedings

Case number: 2024(A)1506

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.10.20

Title: (Criminal Case) Decision concerning the case in which it was ruled that it is not illegal for the court to have not gone through the procedure to alter the counts when, in the case of embezzlement in the pursuit of social activities committed through the acts which as a whole constitute a single crime, the amount embezzled each month was specified in the counts, but the court found larger amounts than the amounts specified in the counts regarding the amounts embezzled in some of the months concerned

Case number: 2025(Gyo-Tsu)155

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.09.26

Title: (Civil Case) Judgment on the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 13, paragraph (1) and Appended Table 1 of the Public Offices Election Act on the demarcation of constituencies for members of the House of Representatives to be elected from single-seat constituencies

Case number: 2025(Ju)250922

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.09.22

Title: Judgment concerning a case in which the court ruled:1. the provisions on eugenic operations under the Eugenic Protection Act (Article 3, paragraph (1), items (i) to (iii), Article 10, and Article 13, paragraph (2) of the same Act) are in violation of Article 13 and Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Constitution;2. the legislative act by the Diet members regarding the provisions on eugenic operations is judged to be illegal in terms of the application of Article 1, paragraph (1) of the State Redress Act;3. if it is extremely contrary to the principles of justice and fairness and totally unacceptable to determine that a claim for compensation for loss or damage arising from a tort has been extinguished by the expiration of the period of exclusion prescribed in the second sentence of Article 724 of the Civil Code (prior to the amendment by Act No. 44 of 2017), the court may determine that the assertion on the period of exclusion is impermissible as it constitutes a violation of the principle of good faith or an abuse of rights; and4. it is contrary to the principle of good faith and impermissible as an abuse of rights to assert the period of exclusion prescribed in the second sentence of Article 724 of the same Code.

Case number: 2023(Ju)2207

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.09.09

Title: (Civil Case) Judgment concerning, in the case where a judgment in an action to dispute a claim, by which a request for the court's disallowance of judicial enforcement was dismissed, became final and binding, and a decision ordering a stay of judicial enforcement in response to a petition filed with that action designated as the primary suit was reversed, whether the person that filed the petition is liable to compensate for damage sustained by the obligee due to the stay of judicial enforcement

Case number: 2024(Ju)239

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.09.04

Title: (Civil Case) Judgment concerning whether an action to seek a declaratory judgment of the invalidity of an agreement specifying the manner of sharing living expenses as a married couple is a lawful action

Case number: 2024(Gyo-Hi)241

Date of the judgment (decision): 2025.09.02

Title: (Civil Case) Judgment concerning whether there is illegality in the determination by the court of prior instance to the effect that the disciplinary action of dismissal that was given to an employee who was a member of the fire defense personnel of a local public entity on the grounds of his behavior against his subordinates is illegal, as it goes beyond the bounds of the discretionary power of the person authorized to take a disciplinary action or constitutes an abuse of such power